SMW as Lego blocks - Revision history

DavidM: Reverted edits by Osejisycym (Talk) to last revision by DavidM

2010-11-24T01:54:46Z

Reverted edits by Osejisycym (Talk) to last revision by DavidM

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 24 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~=[http://awibuky.co.cc This Page Is Currently Under Construction And Will Be Available Shortly, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=~~		<div style="float: left; width: 48%">
	~~<~~div style=~~"~~float: left; width: 48%~~">~~

	Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.		Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.
Line 6:		Line 5:
	[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like Lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.		[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like Lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a ~~"~~table~~"~~ (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is evident, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is evident, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).

	Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the ~~"~~Lego~~"~~ approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

	There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.		There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.
Line 16:		Line 15:
	SMW can support these functions for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge, but users have to learn the markup, which at times is not easy. A SMW site is best represented by a collection of people, some of whom are expert helpers.		SMW can support these functions for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge, but users have to learn the markup, which at times is not easy. A SMW site is best represented by a collection of people, some of whom are expert helpers.

	~~<~~/div~~>~~		</div>
	~~<~~div style=~~"~~float: right; width: 48%~~">~~		<div style="float: right; width: 48%">
	http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4218648900_20939a8ec1.jpg		http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4218648900_20939a8ec1.jpg

	http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4245282827_08d9fcf3b3.jpg		http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4245282827_08d9fcf3b3.jpg
	~~<~~/div~~>~~		</div>

	~~<~~br class=~~"~~cleared~~"~~ /~~>~~		<br class="cleared" />

	{{Blikied\|May 29, 2010}}		{{Blikied\|May 29, 2010}}

	[[Category:SemWeb]]		[[Category:SemWeb]]

Osejisycym at 23:47, 23 November 2010

2010-11-23T23:47:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 23 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div style="float: left; width: 48%">		=[http://awibuky.co.cc This Page Is Currently Under Construction And Will Be Available Shortly, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
			<div style="float: left; width: 48%">

	Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.		Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.
Line 5:		Line 6:
	[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like Lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.		[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like Lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is evident, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is evident, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).

	Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

	There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.		There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.
Line 15:		Line 16:
	SMW can support these functions for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge, but users have to learn the markup, which at times is not easy. A SMW site is best represented by a collection of people, some of whom are expert helpers.		SMW can support these functions for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge, but users have to learn the markup, which at times is not easy. A SMW site is best represented by a collection of people, some of whom are expert helpers.

	</div>		</div>
	<div style="float: right; width: 48%">		<div style="float: right; width: 48%">
	http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4218648900_20939a8ec1.jpg		http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4218648900_20939a8ec1.jpg

	http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4245282827_08d9fcf3b3.jpg		http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4245282827_08d9fcf3b3.jpg
	</div>		</div>

	<br class="cleared" />		<br class="cleared" />

	{{Blikied\|May 29, 2010}}		{{Blikied\|May 29, 2010}}

	[[Category:SemWeb]]		[[Category:SemWeb]]

DavidM at 18:31, 10 June 2010

2010-06-10T18:31:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 10 June 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is ~~obvious~~, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is evident, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).

	Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

DavidM: moved SMW as lego blocks to SMW as Lego blocks

2010-06-10T02:28:44Z

moved SMW as lego blocks to SMW as Lego blocks

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:28, 10 June 2010
(No difference)

DavidM at 02:28, 10 June 2010

2010-06-10T02:28:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 10 June 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.		Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.

	[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like ~~lego~~ blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.		[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like Lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable.		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Also like Lego blocks, the design is obvious, transparent and open (in SMW, using [[Special:Version]] and change histories).

	Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "~~lego~~" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "Lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

	There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.		There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.

DavidM at 17:51, 29 May 2010

2010-05-29T17:51:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 29 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.		[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext ~~document~~ editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable.		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable.

DavidM at 17:49, 29 May 2010

2010-05-29T17:49:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 29 May 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.		Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.

	Semantic Mediawiki (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.		[http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org Semantic Mediawiki] (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext document editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions~~, past what Wordpress can do~~, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is ~~a little more "~~less rounded," but you can re-use the pieces.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext document editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is less rounded, but you can re-use the pieces and constantly build on your knowledge.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable.

	SMW can support ~~this functionality~~ for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge.		Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

			There is more and more re-usable content and components on the Web; [http://simile.mit.edu MIT's SIMILE project] was created to make it easy to embed interactive views across sites and is supported by SMW and Wordpress, Microformats and RDFa make it possible to aggregate content in one place, whether it's restaurant reviews or departmental budgets.

			SMW can support these functions for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge, but users have to learn the markup, which at times is not easy. A SMW site is best represented by a collection of people, some of whom are expert helpers.

	</div>		</div>

DavidM at 17:38, 29 May 2010

2010-05-29T17:38:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 29 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div style="float: left; width: 48%">		<div style="float: left; width: 48%">

	Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box~~, blogs~~... RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can do maps, events, and so on.		Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box... blogs, RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can create maps, events, and so on.

	Semantic Mediawiki (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create special views and functions.		Semantic Mediawiki (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create your own content types, special views and functions.

	Wordpress is use (except when it comes to quick hypertext document editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, past what Wordpress can do, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is a little more "less rounded," but you can re-use the pieces.		Wordpress is easier to use (except when it comes to quick hypertext document editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, past what Wordpress can do, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table" (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is a little more "less rounded," but you can re-use the pieces.

	This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.		This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

			SMW can support this functionality for any site user, in a culture of transparently exchanging knowledge.

	</div>		</div>

DavidM: Created page with '
Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box, blogs... RSS feeds, blog management, with exte…'

2010-05-29T17:35:58Z

Created page with '<div style="float: left; width: 48%"> Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box, blogs... RSS feeds, blog management, with exte…'

New page

<div style="float: left; width: 48%">

Wordpress is like Barbie's Kitchen. You get a kit that lets you do what it shows on the box, blogs... RSS feeds, blog management, with extensions you can do maps, events, and so on.

Semantic Mediawiki (SMW) is like lego blocks. You can combine the basic blocks to make just about any shape, with extensions you can create special views and functions.

Wordpress is use (except when it comes to quick hypertext document editing, where wikis, after a quick introduction, rule). But with SMW, you can recreate most typical functions, past what Wordpress can do, and also recombine pieces. You can take the pieces of a "table (a map location embedded in a page) and make a mosaic (a collection of map locations about a topic). The SMW approach is a little more "less rounded," but you can re-use the pieces.

This is a characteristic of semantic sites. Each piece of content is well defined and re-usable. Wordpress supports some semantic features now, but I prefer the "lego" approach, where people can more easily create different components, without resorting to a complex and difficult to maintain low level language.

</div>
<div style="float: right; width: 48%">
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2590/4218648900_20939a8ec1.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4245282827_08d9fcf3b3.jpg
</div>

<br class="cleared" />

{{Blikied|May 29, 2010}}

[[Category:SemWeb]]