Data Liberation: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'I recently stumbled across Statistic Canada's [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/dli-ild/about-apropos-eng.htm Data Liberation Initiative]. It's exciting to see this effort and terminolog...') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=44219731733&v=info Data Liberation Facebook group] provides some good reasons this is important — ''Do you want fair pricing, transparent testing, faster performance, deeper analytics and straight answers?'' Simply, in my mind, public data and even rights to code you access (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License AGPL]) should be a competitive factor, and in the public service or for any massive scale, something we expect. | The [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=44219731733&v=info Data Liberation Facebook group] provides some good reasons this is important — ''Do you want fair pricing, transparent testing, faster performance, deeper analytics and straight answers?'' Simply, in my mind, public data and even rights to code you access (like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License AGPL]) should be a competitive factor, and in the public service or for any massive scale, something we expect. | ||
The only problem is the Government's DLI is still too narrow. Right now it's aimed at post secondary institutions. There shouldn't be access categories, the same information should be available to 14 year olds and retired persons that's available to academics or public workers. As well, it's hardly a liberation effort when individuals have to pay to access the information. I don't think this we can really say participation and anti corruption are being seriously addressed until that state is reached, and no statements about "our children" can be taken seriously. | |||
I know plenty of individuals and groups who can benefit from this data. After [http://www.zooid.org/~vid/presentations/publicwhip/?p=0070_summary taking a run at it with a friend] (and ultimately failing), [http://michaelmulley.com/ Michael Mulley] has finally got a [http://openparliament.ca/about/ parliament Hansard scraper working], but the amount of effort and reliability will be in jeopardy until this information is intentionally shared. | |||
Bliked [[Bliki date::April 11, 2010]] | Bliked [[Bliki date::April 11, 2010]] | ||
[[Category:Advocacy]] | [[Category:Advocacy]] | ||
Revision as of 16:59, 11 April 2010
I recently stumbled across Statistic Canada's Data Liberation Initiative. It's exciting to see this effort and terminology, which is shared with Google's humorously themed effort.
The Data Liberation Facebook group provides some good reasons this is important — Do you want fair pricing, transparent testing, faster performance, deeper analytics and straight answers? Simply, in my mind, public data and even rights to code you access (like AGPL) should be a competitive factor, and in the public service or for any massive scale, something we expect.
The only problem is the Government's DLI is still too narrow. Right now it's aimed at post secondary institutions. There shouldn't be access categories, the same information should be available to 14 year olds and retired persons that's available to academics or public workers. As well, it's hardly a liberation effort when individuals have to pay to access the information. I don't think this we can really say participation and anti corruption are being seriously addressed until that state is reached, and no statements about "our children" can be taken seriously.
I know plenty of individuals and groups who can benefit from this data. After taking a run at it with a friend (and ultimately failing), Michael Mulley has finally got a parliament Hansard scraper working, but the amount of effort and reliability will be in jeopardy until this information is intentionally shared.
Bliked April 11, 2010