Redboard unpostings: Difference between revisions
→http://redboard.rogers.com/2010/samsung-galaxy-s-captivate-available-from-rogers-mid-october/#comment-12694
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Rogers made a vow to open up their support to 'social media' and post any reasonable comment. This is a very progressive position, but some comments don't seem to be making it through the moderation queue. | Rogers made a vow to open up their support to 'social media' and post any reasonable comment. This is a very progressive position, but some comments don't seem to be making it through the moderation queue. | ||
'''Some of these have been eventually posted''', after the conversation had died down. A few were called off topic. | |||
This is more of a hobbie these days, every once in a while a Rogers moderator replies in a sympathetic tone, but situation is clear. | |||
GOOyzv <a href="http://kloiqrqmopay.com/">kloiqrqmopay</a>, [url=http://twzhspuwjyzb.com/]twzhspuwjyzb[/url], [link=http://yzeeupbwgdso.com/]yzeeupbwgdso[/link], http://nrsyyjoapdph.com/ | |||
== http://redboard.rogers.com/2010/rogers-on-demand-online-rentals-to-launch-next-month/ == | |||
"What are your thoughts on the new service? How have you changed the ways you enjoy video entertainment?" | |||
I realize (and it’s clear from the inclusion of statistics) that Rogers doesn’t need to focus on what any individual wants. But I don’t want just first run movies, trendy sports and series in an exclusive community, I want world scale choice and pricing with the knowledge and chaos of the Internet. I have yet to see any Rogers promotions that have been aimed at me, aside maybe from the initial “open,” “revolution” Android ads, which unfortunately proved rather false. While I am not included in “nearly 60 per cent of 18-34 year-old,” I am pretty sure the majority of people would simply like Roger to provide reliable, fast, competitive Internet service so we can choose from a global palette of options. Rogers should certainly participate in extra offerings, but not to the detriment to the bigger idea. | |||
Posted Sept 10 morning. One day later several other postings made ... not that one. | |||
== Samsung Galaxy S Captivate coming soon to Rogers == | |||
Below not posted but they posted a more controversial post wit some back and forth: | |||
---- | |||
I think you missed one point: | |||
- Rogers wanted to head off any customers thinking of going to Bell for this device | |||
However, if Rogers doesn’t literally *release* this device in “weeks” as they stated, they’re being dishonest. | |||
By the way, I’d made similar points about the Samsung Galaxy S captivate coming soon to Rogers in another post that never made it here, perhaps something about it was considered “offtopic” *cough* unsubsidized plans with consumers buying and controlling their handset of choice on the open market *cough* | |||
Posted Aug 19, 2010 1435 in response to a similar post that didn't make it. | |||
== RedBoard’s FAAQ: Frequently Asked Android Questions == | |||
Alan - let me assure you, you don't need to step in and apologize on behalf of corporations. There's nothing, anywhere that says "consumer phones are meant to be locked down." That's more tenuous than Rogers' statement that their offering would be a "revolution" and "open." A statement that some of us would like them to follow up on, rather than making excuses on their behalf that accepts a dysfunctional status quo. | |||
I have no desire to own the Nexus One as I want a keyboard device. Further, the formula doesn't make sense, since I'd be continuing to pay monthly subsidization fees to Rogers, effectively nearly paying double for my handset. | |||
Please, unless you're going to say something useful, next time keep your thoughts to yourself. ;) | |||
Post May 13 | |||
== Rogers self-service on demand: How-to videos, cheat sheets and FAQs == | == Rogers self-service on demand: How-to videos, cheat sheets and FAQs == | ||
Line 41: | Line 81: | ||
I have been continually promoting a few themes — | I have been continually promoting a few themes — | ||
* Rogers [and HTC] made a mistake with the Dream's inability to upgrade and the Magic offer was not an adequate response for | * Rogers [and HTC] made a mistake with the Dream's inability to upgrade and the Magic offer was not an adequate response [for many Dream purchasers] | ||
* customers should be able to more easily replace or upgrade devices purchased through Rogers without having to go through bizarre 'contract cancellation' contortions. ideally, within a few clicks through their myRogers account | * customers should be able to more easily replace or upgrade devices purchased through Rogers without having to go through bizarre 'contract cancellation' contortions. ideally, within a few clicks through their myRogers account | ||
* It's good Rogers has clarified we can use third party devices, and even embraced the Nexus One. However, people who are not using a subsidized device should be paying a lower fee [rogers can use its position as a hardware purveyor more competitively and progressively] | * It's good Rogers has clarified we can use third party devices, and even embraced the Nexus One. However, people who are not using a subsidized device should be paying a lower fee [rogers can use its position as a hardware purveyor more competitively and progressively] |