2,153
edits
Rogers Dream fiasco and Canada reasonable carrier provisions: Difference between revisions
Rogers Dream fiasco and Canada reasonable carrier provisions (view source)
Revision as of 15:39, 8 February 2010
, 8 February 2010no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
As I said to you in our other conversation, in order to be successful, | As I said to you in our other conversation, in order to be successful, | ||
there | there must be very specific, reasonable requests most people will agree with. | ||
Otherwise, people cannot be bothered, as typified in | Otherwise, people cannot be bothered, as typified in | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
them" (after substantial inconvenience, see Y's response). This | them" (after substantial inconvenience, see Y's response). This | ||
defeats any ability to make noise to get attention, to organize behind | defeats any ability to make noise to get attention, to organize behind | ||
reasonable demands | reasonable demands that most consumers will agree to. | ||
If I were to write a reasonable charter for mobile providers, it would | If I were to write a reasonable charter for mobile providers, it would | ||
| Line 77: | Line 76: | ||
[[Category:Advocacy]] | [[Category:Advocacy]] | ||
[[Category:Android]] | |||