Micropayments and Wikileaks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<div style="float: right"> http://flattr.com/_img/flattr-logo-og.png </div> http://flattr.com Micropayments were supposed to be one of the breakthroughs of the Web. Instead of ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Micropayments were supposed to be one of the breakthroughs of the Web. Instead of going through a "credit card" process, just click to leave a small payment (< $1.00) for something you like. | Micropayments were supposed to be one of the breakthroughs of the Web. Instead of going through a "credit card" process, just click to leave a small payment (< $1.00) for something you like. | ||
With Paypal, Visa and Mastercard dumping Wikileaks, Flattr could make a breakthrough as they've committed to supporting WikiLeaks. Their model is interesting, commit to an amount per month, say $10, and each of your | With Paypal, Visa and Mastercard dumping Wikileaks, Flattr could make a breakthrough as they've committed to supporting WikiLeaks. Their model is interesting, commit to an amount per month, say $10, and each of your clicks contributes a division of that amount. | ||
On that note, something on the non-relationship between Wikileaks and Anonymous. | On that note, something on the non-relationship between Wikileaks and Anonymous. | ||
Revision as of 03:07, 16 December 2010
Micropayments were supposed to be one of the breakthroughs of the Web. Instead of going through a "credit card" process, just click to leave a small payment (< $1.00) for something you like.
With Paypal, Visa and Mastercard dumping Wikileaks, Flattr could make a breakthrough as they've committed to supporting WikiLeaks. Their model is interesting, commit to an amount per month, say $10, and each of your clicks contributes a division of that amount.
On that note, something on the non-relationship between Wikileaks and Anonymous.
