2,153
edits
Data Liberation: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The only problem is the Government's DLI is way too narrow. Right now it's aimed at post secondary institutions. There shouldn't be access categories, the same information should be available to 14 year olds and retired persons that's available to academics or public workers. As well, it's hardly a liberation effort when individuals have to pay to access the information. I don't think we can really say participation and issues such as anti corruption are being seriously addressed until these kinds of issues are resolved, nor can any statements about what "our children" are inheriting be taken seriously. | The only problem is the Government's DLI is way too narrow. Right now it's aimed at post secondary institutions. There shouldn't be access categories, the same information should be available to 14 year olds and retired persons that's available to academics or public workers. As well, it's hardly a liberation effort when individuals have to pay to access the information. I don't think we can really say participation and issues such as anti corruption are being seriously addressed until these kinds of issues are resolved, nor can any statements about what "our children" are inheriting be taken seriously. | ||
Once this kind of data is released, we can expect greater participation and new forms of employment through crowd sourcing and volunteer efforts (for example, making specialized information easier to understand). There are plenty of civic minded, hobbyist or retired persons who would love to understand work on big problems, and with computers and the Internet any one person or group can achieve so much in their spare time. The trust issues don't really exist, people can learn to not trust a first glance at info just like they have with spam and wikipedia, and digital relationships will become a concrete part of our reality. Of course personal information will be protected, but access to massive correlation alone would make this a breakthrough. | Once this kind of data is released, we can expect greater participation and new forms of employment through crowd sourcing and volunteer efforts (for example, making specialized information easier to understand). There are plenty of civic minded, hobbyist or retired persons who would love to understand work on big problems, and with computers and the Internet any one person or group can achieve so much in their spare time. The trust issues don't really exist, people can learn to not trust a first glance at info just like they have with spam and wikipedia, and digital trust relationships will become a concrete part of our reality. (Of course personal information will be protected, but access to massive correlation alone would make this a breakthrough.) | ||
I know plenty of individuals and groups who can benefit from this data, so many problems that can be solved so we can move onto bigger ones. After [http://www.zooid.org/~vid/presentations/publicwhip/?p=0070_summary taking a run at it with a friend] (and ultimately failing), [http://michaelmulley.com/ Michael Mulley] has finally got a [http://openparliament.ca/about/ parliament Hansard scraper working], but the amount of effort and reliability will be in jeopardy until this information is ''intentionally'' shared. | I know plenty of individuals and groups who can benefit from this data, so many problems that can be solved so we can move onto bigger ones. After [http://www.zooid.org/~vid/presentations/publicwhip/?p=0070_summary taking a run at it with a friend] (and ultimately failing), [http://michaelmulley.com/ Michael Mulley] has finally got a [http://openparliament.ca/about/ parliament Hansard scraper working], but the amount of effort and reliability will be in jeopardy until this information is ''intentionally'' shared. | ||